A Bad Hair Day
- Posted on 18 August, 2022
- Sew-In Hair Extensions
- By Anonymous
The plaintiff says she hired the defendant to put on hair extensions, but the woman botched the job and damaged the plaintiff’s scalp so badly that she has migraines. She’s suing for her money back and pain and suffering. The defendant says she told the plaintiff not to wash her hair immediately after the extensions, but the plaintiff ignored her and the hair tape got wet. She’s countersuing for defamation.
Case #25298
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court
Foreign Diane Hernandez, she says she hired the defendant to put in hair extensions and the woman ruined her head and scalped in the process. The unruly unprofessional woman is claiming she did nothing wrong and it's also accusing her of pulling her own hair out now she suffers from terrible migraine headaches. Something has to be done to stop this woman from doing the same thing to someone else and that's why she's here suing her for the 2175 dollars she's old foreign? This is the defendant, Nikki Banks. She says she told the plaintiff not to wash her hair after their appointment. She did and the tape got wet and she had a problem. She told her she'd, be there the very next day to fix it, but the plaintiff smeared her name all over social media. She once had a five-star rating on Facebook now because of the crazy impatient plaintiff. She has a 3.8 rating, oh or money, no way She's accused of causing a hair raising experience the defendant, who saw the counters who for five hundred dollars for defamation of character, all parties. Please use your idea. We see to come to our place. Litigants have been torn your honor. Thank you Douglas Diana Hernandez. You are suing Nakia Banks, doing businesses, Luxe, Hair Studios, okay for two thousand one hundred and seventy five dollars that you say you are owed 2, 000 of it in pain and suffering and 175 that you paid her for the hair. What happened correct? Oh by the way - and you were counterclaiming her for 500 for defaming you on Facebook, okay, let me hear from you first on your claim. On October, 2nd, I hired Miss Banks to do hair extensions from a place called Thumbtack the website a website, okay website business. So you type in hair stylist in the search, correct thing, and then it tells you who's in your area. Yes, they um, I guess, send a message to the hair stylist or whatever, and then you two communicate yes correct. So do you pay uh a certain amount to have your name on there? Yes, um! Well, it's not to have the name on there. You pay a certain amount for each prospective um client that you get. How do you get your name on there? I submitted my cosmetology license, so I have and you have to and then how do all those comments get up there once you do a service with uh with a customer from Thumbtack they and uh will go ahead and send that person a um survey, a survey To say interesting what a great idea um go ahead, um! Well, she came to my home and um. She stood there about an hour and she put these tape in extensions. Had you ever done tape in extensions? No, I have not what kind of extensions had you done before um Fusion extensions and then a sew-in extensions, so you wanted to try tape yeah. I wanted to try tape, okay, so um I found. Did you tell her office before or no yes, I did. I have it all here: okay, so go ahead and then um she came. She stood there like I said an hour and then she was late because she said that uh her Tire had got flat, so maybe that she was just probably having a bad day. That day and took it out of my head on your head: yes, okay, so how did she take it out on your head? What was the problem she's behind me? I can't see what she's doing behind me. So I had my head down. She was putting tape in putting the tape across my head and then adding the weft to the tape the what weft what's left. I actually have a sample of the hair weft. It'S the hair, that's on the track, so you can purchase the hair without hair being on the track or they sew the hair to a track so that it's able to a track is what like a long piece. So these are what the track is here. That'S as wide as the track comes they're different lengths. You can measure them and have them cut to customize the person's head. So when you're taping it is there actual tape that goes on my head. It'S actually hair tape and it's a double size. I have a sample of the hair tape of the Heritage. Yes, I'm coming down, so this is the double-sided hair tape. Is that a sample of what you used on her? This is the actual one that was using her hair. I kept it okay now how long? Okay, so a very thin, you would measure it the size of the hair right and then you would put it put the hair, the weft onto the table. So what are you taping it to her hair yeah, the one to the hair? So when it comes out, how does it come out? You have a hair dissolvant, a glue, the solvent okay to dissolve it. So yeah there's a solvent that you have to use. Otherwise you know there's tape. It'S it's glue, it's going to be there, so you have to use this. How do I get the solvent between the adhesive tape in my hair? How do I get it in there so that it doesn't rip my hair out? It'S it normally comes in a nozzle. Oh well here it is. This is the whole thing together. You know what I don't see: men using hair, extensions or honest to God. I don't know what's wrong with us: um. Okay, so can you wash your hair when there's tape in it? I advise. I do tell my clients that I do advise to not have the base of the hair. It went within the first 24 hours because you would want to give the glue time to and then, after that, what can you do and then, after that, you can wash it um? I wouldn't suggest vigorous hair washing, but yeah you can wash it. How do you? How do you and your personal hygiene, when you have to how long does this stuff last um it lasts a few weeks? You can usually keep it in for maybe two to three weeks and then what starts happening after two three after two to three weeks. They will start to slip out, yes, okay, so this is a very popular procedure tape because it sounds Neanderthal. Did she ask you for taper? Was that your suggestion? She asked me about the tape and asked me um, compare it to the micro links or to the fusion that I think that people do with tape. How well not very many people that I have like the tape um only because of the time frame. You'Re only able to keep it in, you know a few weeks and they were like something a little more permanent all right, so you paid 175 dollars and when did you start to see a problem? Um? First of all, your honor, she told me I could wash my hair the same day. She did not say I couldn't wash it. Did you wash your hair that day, no, it fell out within the hour. Just fell out. Yes, how soon did you call her right? After she left within probably 40 minutes, okay, and then did she call you right away about two hours later. She called me and she said that um she had one of them that came out. What day of the week, were you doing her hair at her house? Um, I'm not sure the day of the week, but it was the second of October. I believe, second of October, was she texting you or calling you? I can't remember. I want to say this: okay, so find the text series on October, 2nd, that's what I want to look at. I have all the taxes on October, 2nd yeah hand it to my Baler. Thank you go ahead and so um I tell her. Okay, no problem. I can go ahead and fix it. I asked her what was she doing the following morning? She said: yes, you know. Okay, we set it up for 9 00 a.m. For me to come the following day and um 20 minutes later she texts me and says they all fell out. So I said, thank you. Can you stop interrupting her? I'M driving? I don't want to get a ticket right about now. You know I don't want to get a ticket for talking on my phone, you know, can I give you a call around four o'clock and we can talk. She tells me that she's on her way to the doctor, she's not going to be able to talk, and I told her just give me a call when she can next thing. I know between um Thumbtack, the site that we're on Yelp as well as my Facebook page. She starts going on there. She wrote a review says she wants all her money back and I said well wait a minute when did it get to this point? I just talked to you a while ago, and we've set up a time for me to come tomorrow morning and now you're at the point that you've made this review and you want all your money back. So you feel like she pulled her extensions out because she just said: I'm not I'm not dealing with this. She said thinning hair doesn't do that. That'S what she said. She said she said biggest mistake that she did was she she took them out herself. Did you pull these out because I'm kind of finding it hard to believe that all of them fell out? I think that maybe you were testing the whole track and, as I put water, which she said, I could I didn't put soap shampoo conditioner. Nothing like that. Just added water because it was so hard, so I was brushing it and then the whole track came out what she showed. You is actually a tape in how it's supposed to look where she put in my head. Didn'T even look like that. What did I? The pictures - okay, let me see the pictures - this is one track right, uh she put uh three long pieces of tape stuck to, I guess three pieces of track on my hair, okay, okay and the hair that I have the hair in my purse right here. The hair that she has here, they don't sell it on her website, because I want to know why was it hard when I you know and why? But what is it you're saying? I don't understand what you're saying where's the LIE: what did she do? Okay, she lied when she said the hair was Brazilian hair. How do you know that prove that to me because she brought the hair in in this package right? Okay, so I contact her hair people to say you know what her hair people, the name. That'S on the package: maven.com, what's maven.com maven.com is a company that um plenty of Hair Stylist shoes and they are Distributors for that hair company. But did you buy it from them yourself, yes and then you're, trying to tell me that what that you called Maven and they said she didn't buy from them yeah and you have a note from Maven that they don't sell what Brazilian hair or they don't sell. This all tray hair, nor did let me see that too wet it, and you can see judge that it's they'll it's hard like a horse hair. How do you spell Maven m-a-y-v-e-n-n? What she's saying is that this is another brand and what Maven is saying is we don't sell this brand um? I I have a lot of hair in my home, so what I do is once I get the hair instead of just having it just in the open, I put it in a bag so that I have something to keep it in you. What was in the bag before that? It was a different brand company, Ultra, probably it's a different, probably brand company. So I we're not funky what you're saying? Okay, why are you suing for two thousand dollars? You you had a plan that she was going to come and fix everything tomorrow. You say you know what I don't like this, because that's fine, but why aren't you just suing for what you paid her? Why did you have to because up until 20 times, like I said the weft coming out, it left the tape in my head and when they had to remove the tape who's there, I paid a hair stylist to remove proof of that. No, I didn't have a statement on that person. No, I do not, but pictures from it. Okay, show me the pictures, my own hair, your honor, that that's very painful what I went through all right, so you have a counter claim against her for 500 because she went on your Facebook page right. Is it okay? It was um a couple of the social media's platforms. One of them was Yelp, she had a friend, so she put her negative reviews on you. Why is that actionable by you for 500? Well, because at first it wasn't just her negative reviews that would have been fine if she felt the way whatever it was, that she felt and wanted to make a review about it. She had her boyfriend or someone and two other people. You know, okay, so just so happens the same day that she decides to get the get her hair extensions done. Three people that are all um wait. One person was a boyfriend, he said exactly who he was. One person was a boyfriend. That was another person. You don't have a boyfriend welcome back to the People's Court Harvey 11 in front of the TMZ, a Hollywood tour bus in Los Angeles. So the question um. Can you sue somebody for defamation? If they talk crap about you on social media and everybody talks crap on social media uh, if it's true, I don't think so. Okay, but let's say it's not true, let's I mean is social media the same as when a newspaper say prince. I don't think so. I think I think there's anybody can say whatever they want, so it's not right. No, I mean it's documented they're. If they're gon na spread rumors about you, whether it's true or not, I believe that I mean you can get a defamation. Well, true you're! You got a problem, false, that's another story going inside the courtroom. Like show me what you're looking at it's on my cell phone, I can't get it. You would like to read. Take your time. Just show me the comments. You'Re talking about sure. Is there anything they said that was anything other than opinion if they lie about something, that's the definition, but when she says she's rude, that's opinion when she says it was terrible. That'S opinion. Okay, says on October 4th my girlfriend had her hair done by Nikki. Never again will I pay for such a service. Her service was October, 2nd. So why are you assuming that? That'S her boyfriend? Well, here's the thing: um yeah! I may not been that he may have did the review with that and then the other, the also by the way, Jordan is also October 4th. So maybe Jordan also wasn't happy, which doesn't make a difference to me and my ruling here today. You know when you put yourself out there and you're doing there's going to be people who are happy. There'S going to be people who are unhappy. When I say I have to be honest with you, when I see a vendor with five, nothing but fives, I assume all their family members wrote the reviews. That'S all I'm going to say I understand but um in any event, uh, let's talk about what's going on here. First of all, let's talk about what this is. Definitely not it's not defamation of character. For the reasons, I've explained everything that she wrote that you can prove she wrote because these others aren't even on the same day so um. It'S totally her opinion of how her experience was. She has an absolute First Amendment right to express it. That is not to be confused with lying in order to affect somebody's business, so you need to get a thicker skin. Second of all, let's talk about your claim against her for 2175, say again, why it is that you're entitled to not just your money back, but two thousand dollars more the migraines from having that balance of migraines um. I don't have no medical evidence on migraines. Okay, all right, I'm gon na rule in favor of the plaintiff in this case, in the amount of the 175 dollars, plus, of course, your court costs and filing the case. That is my verdict. Well, nothing on your counter suit and the plaintiff says collect some against you for the work you did you still proud of that work. I'M very proud of my work, I'm I'm confident in what I do and I stand by everything. What went wrong? I don't know. I just just dissatisfied customers, it does happen right. I got fives right across the board. I would feel a little weary about going to a company that did have fives across the board. So it's okay, I'm I'm good with it and again I stand by my work. So I wouldn't have done anything differently. Okay, all right! That'S the way! All right step on in here satisfied how this comes out. Um yeah, I wish the judge judge would have gave me my pain and suffering, but you want the 2000 for the bad hair day. Yep, oh harrowing: is it for a woman to go through this with with hair hair falling out? It doesn't work out. You look in the mirror, and what do you see? It'S just terrible and we won't talk about it: okay, but you're. Okay, now no Harvey yeah! Okay, Kurt, so if you just so, you know if you state something as opinion, you are way more protected in terms of being sued for defamation than if you state something, as fact
Comments
Nicole Wright: The plaintiff was definitely lying, I know many women who wear wigs, extensions etc, and never went home that same day after paying a lot of money, and washed their hair. The women was displeased with the finished product and purposely messed up her own hair. Than tried to get a big pay day.
Lovely One: The defendant is beautiful and I can tell that she is proud of her work and puts a lot into what she does. The plaintiff on the other hand was looking for a big pay day trying to get over on someone and I do believe she pulled her own tape extensions out after claiming the one fell out! Who the hell does she think she’s fooling?? SMH ♀️
Tricia Easley: The defendant was very classy. The plaintiff, not so much.
Nannerchan: How much worse could it have looked than what she has, now?
DonziGT230: The plaintiff should have lost for not letting the defendant try to fix it at least once. And it's very odd that she said they all fell out and that the tape was so well stuck to her head that it was super painful to remove.
Ellie 💋: She gave herself headaches from pulling the tracks out instead of buying the tape remover.
Luisa Andrea: Ha ha!! She was trying to collect $2,000 for a bad hair day I believe 100% she took them off
R L: She wanted something she's got no experience with and gets mad at the stylist instead of herself for poor choices
jackie b: I feel like the plaintiff looks like she's going to go complain to the manager at Walmart. You're supposed to dress nicely for court. Not like a bum heckling people for cigarettes. She may not have a boyfriend, but, she definitely has a sketchy baby daddy.
Precious Jemstone: I'm confused about the judgement in this case. How was the plaintiff entitled to money when she had no proof that the hair was coming out by itself and she never even saw the defendant to have her put them back in??? She could have removed them herself just because she didn't like the hair which definitely shouldn't have entitled her to a full refund.
Tashia Redd: If the plaintiff had tape-ins that fell out how did she have migraines? Even if she did have another stylist take them out…. They use a solvent!! So where is the pain??
Mustang girl: I’m a licensed hairstylist also and I’ve done those extensions as well, she told her exactly what she needed to do. You can wash your hair the same day even tho it’s not recommended but the tape is very strong. I don’t believe the plaintiff when she said they all fell out the same day.
D D W: The plaintiff def washed her hair, and (this is just my opinion not factual) looks like a addict looking for a come up. Also she def got her family and friends to put up those fake reviews. Tape is extremely temporary, and with straight hair since the hair is more prone to being oily and it has no texture to grip it will not last long. Second time today I saw JM ignoring some clear tell tell signs the plaintiff is lying. Also I hate her rulings on hair cases because she has no clue what she’s talking about, def on hair extension cases. She rules wrongly most of the time due to that lack of knowledge.
Nicole Scott: That Plaintiff was a liar, you could tell how mad she was that she only got her $175 back. What trash. That's all she was there for was tryna get $2175 for NOTHING. I feel for the Defendant.....
Nameless: I wish that I could collect $2k for every time that someone gave me a headache. I’d be the richest man alive with how much stupidity is out there.
Lynne: The quip the judge made about the defendant’s reviews was uncalled for. Everyone knows that people only post reviews when they’re really satisfied or when they’re really dissatisfied so it was unfair for the judge to suggest that if a vendor has all five star reviews, their family members must have done that for them. Maybe the defendant really is good at what she does and this was the first time she had a dissatisfied customer. The plaintiff shouldn’t have been awarded anything in this case but for some reason the judge seemed determined to believe the plaintiff’s story even though it sounded super shady.
GM: It’s mind boggling how people sue for pain and suffering yet bring no proof of it to court. She should be grateful she got all her money back plus court costs, yet here she comes out of the court room like a dejected child who was told to go to their room with no TV and no video games. Smh.
bluebutterfly244: The defendant was making an effort to make things right. The plaintiff was being unreasonable to not allow her to try. I hope the defendant's business does well.
Michelle Rogers: The plaintiff is a liar! You don't get migraines from that! She went looking for money! She made herself look bad. Big baby.
MsSparklesNGlitter: The plaintiff needs a lot more than hair extensions to make her look cuter. She is a scam artist, she absolutely pulled those extensions off and tried to make a big $$ day.
Demi Whitley: I believe the judgement was fair. If she would have came to my house with a plastic outre bag and a roll of hair tape I would have thought the same thing that the hair is cheap.. but she got what she paid for. Tape extension cost way more then $175. Also extensions comes in silk dust bags and she should have bought medical proof of her headaches.. but overall this was an interesting case
Martia Devarti: She know that she pulled them out. She is scamming.
Life In Progress: Who is responsible for her bad hair today? Also homegirl at 2:40 almost sounded like she was losing track of her lying ass story
Paris L: This verdict was confusing. I've seen Milian rule against the plaintiff in cases with this exact same situation happening, a plaintiff claiming their hair/scalp was damaged with no real proof of how it happened. Why on earth was the plaintiff entitled to a refund???
arianefr78: I don't see why she got all her money back, what about the fact that she has no proof that it fell out, nor proof that she didn't wash it and as she said, she brushed it vigorously, so why again, did she get all her money back?...
Leola: It kills me when the judge acts like she’s never had extensions and men use hairpiece’s too.
Kori Rene: "You know what I don't see: men using hair extensions!" Oh Judge, if you only knew! Can't wait for that case on People's Court!
Set Free: Let me get this straight, you started getting migraines because you pulled your hair out? I disagree with JM on this one. She should not get her money back. She never gave the defendant a chance to fix the problem. I think she was having buyers remorse.
Saron Malloy: Defendant’s hair looks great—plaintiff appears so miserable.
la james: JM is sometimes very attitudy when its not even warranted ... the plaintiff was looking for a big payout .. she took the hair out and literally tried to capitalize off of the bs she did .. I don't trust it
M: Plaintiff looks so over it with that nasty attitude bestie you paid POCKET CHANGE for that service
trixr4kid: Yeah the plaintiff was lying, she started messing with it as soon as she left and messed it up. Why put water on it right after getting it done? She know damn well the beautician didn't tell her that
Denice Knight: I think she just wanted a pay day. $175 is all she was owed and that’s what the judge seen.
Vindicated: This judge is so irritating sometimes. She asks a question then yells over the person before the can answer.
butyoucancallmesam: The judge needs expert witnesses - like a black hairstylist.
Karl: Someone has to say it - there ain't no hair extension available that will make that plaintiff attractive looking.
Bob Stewart: The only thing I believed from the plaintiff was that she doesn't have a boyfriend.
Good Vibes: Why’d he have to ask her about her hair falling out like that? “You look in the mirror and what do you see?” Bruh
Rachelly0: Plaintiff just seems like a scam artist to me who goes around suing people to try and get a nice lil pay day
Dani Woodson: Guaranteed the plaintiff brushed her extensions without holding the base like she was brushing her own head and pulled them out. Why are you wetting and brushing taped in extensions 20 min after they've been put in?? What sense does that make. She tried it.
Francisco Guzman: Plaintiff tried to pulled a fast one lol. Money grab.
Sierra Nicole: I think a huge part of the verdict is the judges lack of understanding of extensions, she sounded confused.
Stephanie Ruiz: I have never and I repeat never washed my hair the same day of getting it done whether it be, a haircut, color, blow dry, sew in, tape in etc. and I’ve done them all. Girl bye
Foreverever: “I don’t have no medical records” OF COURSE you don’t scammer lol
Butterfly Goddess: She washed it and then when it started slipping she pulled it out and damaged her hair. She shouldn't have received anything.
Game Changer: ‘Tape’ in someone’s hair sounds like a disaster. I believe the plaintiff but not sure why she would want such a style anyway. It doesn’t seem like a secure style and sounds like you could lose a lot of hair!
Tee Nicole: JM really picks and chooses who she wants to give Defamation of character. I just seen another case where she ruled a person could receive it because that person had other people go leave reviews and that was wrong, so what’s the difference here? It makes sense the reviews were a day later because on the same day they made plans to have her hair fixed and then she decided the next day to go to another stylist to remove her hair and was upset she didn’t get her money back. I’m noticing this a lot with JM, especially when it comes to certain type of defendants and plaintiffs. The plaintiff blatantly lied. Who gets their hair done and then immediately washes it after?
Nyshiaa 💙: The plaintiff shouldn’t have got anything back, the judge needs to have a specialist in black hair to come for these cases bc they come to pc knowing the judge doesn’t know anything and they are going to win . A lot of these people get money back and they shouldn’t have.
Laura Tarsi: It’s weird that she said tape ins last 2-3 weeks. I’ve gotten them done like 6-8 times and it’s always around 4-6 weeks and you can wash your hair like normal just with a sulphate free shampoo. You shouldn’t wash in the first 24 hours though but they shouldn’t be falling out.
Rebel Mommy: Listening to the plaintiff talk, I cannot help but wonder if she is on some type of meds. She does not seem to be very...what's the word...maybe coherent.
AEIOU15: Why did she have to pay for a stylist to take them out if they fell out like she claimed.
Dan Basford: People like the plaintiff who lie to get a payday will always end up paying more than they ever get. Karma will get them some day. Often it will give people a chance to make amends, but it isn't going to wait for long. Therefore, just be honest.
E To: ohh chile... as soon as she said mayvenn.. i was like NOPE. I have used their hair before and it was the worst hair I had bought.
Wanda Hardesty: The defendant is very graceful and seems to be honest. As well as cute as a button! I wish her only the best!! I believe the plaintiff was just looking for a payday!
Shoogaz Lemons Cakes: She could've very easily just got a Hair Topper on Amazon and called it a day, She clearly tried something that she didn't know how to maintain and was looking to get a pay day for her ignorance on the proper upkeep of hairstyles
bjohnson1149: I can't believe that the dependent won this case. I think Judge M is wrong on this one. Snark alert: if I looked like the plaintiff I'd look for extensions too, also a good bra and a makeup artist!
Tamora Monique: Something ain't right tape in extensions don't just fall out like that. They are really sticky.
Tracey S: My tape in extentions lasted 6-8 weeks before they needed to be moved back up. One of the times during covid they lasted 10 weeks before it was too hard to maintain. They always reused the same extentions and only replaced the tape. I would have never agreed to a full weft that goes ear to ear with tape in extentions... just because I wouldn't be able to do multiple hairstyles and I don't think the tape is meant for that much weight. The first week of tape in extentions are not comfortable for anyone.... so I am not sure you can call that pain and suffering
Lee Lee: Wow, first issue is don’t ever use mayveen hair, it’s mixed with synthetic fibers and is not good quality. Mayveen is the lowest hair you could use. These hair court issues are so complicated this is why I learned to do my own hair.
Leola: Extensions would not cause permanent migraines
paul onorato: Just buy a bouffant wig, and call it a day.
Strive 1030: I wouldnt have even gave her the 175 if anything i woulda gave back 50% of it because she didnt give her the chance to fix it She just wanted it for free in my opinion
Rae Neal: I'd like to say I love that JM is always taking the time to ask about the various things people do to their hair.
Zee Prince: The plaintiff could definitely use a good shower
babylove: i had purple tape ins when i was like 13-14! i loved them. i did purple for domestic violence awareness before i was allowed to color my hair edit: plus she wasnt even happy about winning the case. she took a $100 appt and tried to turn it into $2k. she just wanted the money.
annette dubreuil: When you WISH you could directly address the immature people,in this case the plaintiff, about how crazy they sound, and especially at the end-dissapointed they didnt get emotional damage $$. You wanna see what emotional is.....put yourself in the shoes of someone whos really sick or lost loved ones etc...not aw damn i didnt get my "free entitled money". She makes me sick for people like her, anything to get free money!!! Yes its sad for what happened,i agree 100percentttt iffff she followed the directions but we know she did her own damage. Her face gives it away. and then being so depressed at the end coming out of courtroom, oh how she cant talk about it, shes so emotionally traumatized.
Lucky win: You know the plaintiff was lying when she got her money back and she rolled her eyes at JM
The2Coolest2: "Are you okay now?" "No" "Harvey?" LMAO
lola lenice: I know for a fact the plaintiff washed her hair the same day and forgot then when they messed up she tried to blame the defendant the defendant looks professional and I can tell she does good work
Lola N: Oh, But Judge Milian, men do get hair extension, hair plugs, and weaves. It's just not talked about as much.
TiffyB: Take care of your natural hair and if you want extensions just get a wig!
eyee Luna: Did the plaintiff ever answer if she had a boyfriend...so funny when the judge ask "Do you have a boyfriend?"
Karma Per Diem: The voice and the extremely monotonous yet nagging way of speaking of the plaintiff is giving ME a migraine!! I think I should sue HER for that!!
sara paul: It was so satisfying how the plaintiff was mad with the ruling and didn’t get her pay day! Oh well she probably sues any chance she can !
LaLaLA LaLaLA: I normally don't comment on the litigants looks, but the defendant is a really gorgeous woman.
⸸Liz. F⸸: there are far more weave techniques than I ever imagined
Carrie Priegel: Plaintiff claimed she was told it was ok she could wash her hair same day. Sprinkle sugar on that hun, call it candy but it's .
Weezy Jefferson: Migraines from tape in extensions?
CloClo: The stylist is out of line for trying to pass off beauty supply store hair for unprocessed hair.
Renee Mechelle: He said you look in the mirror and what did you see. That was so funny to me.
C T: For those confused: It would be the defendant’s burden to show that the plaintiff removed the extensions as it’s HER defense. She couldn’t.
tj jd: Apparently the stylist that took the tape out pulled all of her hair out. She should sue that stylist. They didn't use the proper solution to remove the tape. As strong as that tape seem I dont see how the tracks slipped
Tone Riggz: The Becky’s are in awe of this witchcraft.
Mar Leonetti: defendant may have won but instead she lost because the judge thought it was kind of shady to put hair in a package with a different company name on it and i think it made the defendant lose some credibility so she was ordered to return the fee for her services .
MekhahBoo Hunter: She still having a bad hair day..That wig she's wearing looks a mess!
Catalina Fang: The plaintiff was lying and was looking for a pay day.
Kay daura: Outre hair is what you buy from the beauty supply store. Why would you put Mayvenn hair in an outre bag? That’s the point where I started to disbelieve the defendant.
Mademoiselle Elayne: I love tapeins! And yes you can wash your hair, I wear them often. I’ve never been told not to wash them day of install, but why would you lol?!
Islandgirll: Judge should’ve never gave her back her money! Sorry all her tracks came out 40 mins later smh and in other cases judge always say you didnt give her a chance to fix it. What makes this case so diff? Plus who washes there hair right after having it done? FISHY!?
Derrick P: Judge Milian: men don’t use extensions!!! Men: Hold my coffee!!!!
Bleu Belle: I don't understand. I watched another episode where the Plaintiffs friends went on the defendants business page and wrote bad reviews and the defendant was able to collect but in this case she says whether someone else wrote bad reviews at the request of the plaintiff it's neither here nor there, she also didn't even allow the defendant to talk about it . Also how can 5he plaintiff win when she has no proof the hair fell out and gave the defendant no time to remedy the situation? Plaintiff is a liar. The hairs were giving her migraines yet fell out?
Chuck: How can the tape be so weak the hair falls out but strong enough to stick to the rest of her hair lol
DeNisheun Jackson: The plaintiff shouldn’t of gotten any money back. She did not properly take care of her hair, there’s no way alll of the hair came out
Brian Cronise: Defendant messed up when she thought the plaintiff had a boyfriend
Bivens D: Judge is rude AF!
GC Cretan: When was your last visit to the dentist and come home and have a T-bone steak after the dentist warning you don’t eat solid foods, it’s common sense.
Øbey Day: As a fellow Cosmo, the stylist is lying. Outre is only sold at the beauty supply or online beauty supplies. Mayvenn sells bundles directly from the source. Outre is known for synthetic hair and blends which makes it very easy to look at the wefts and distinguish whether or not it is truly a bundle of singular sourced hair. This is the equivalent of her buying Jordan’s and receiving Shaq’s and the seller saying “they got confused about the brand”. There’s no way , Outre and Mayvenn come in different packaging and are not even sold at the same places.
nunya beeswax: plaintiff is just in MANY ways. and why does JM act like the concept of weave is so foreign? she’s a women, in 2022, on TELEVISION! she knows darn well what a weft/track is . Defendant is a class act ☺️
MrBling67: The defendant was trying to work with her but she went for the pie in the sky
The Show and Tell Show ;D: I feel like teeth are way more important than hair